Design is not about the pixels — or why the lean approach rocks

For a while now, I focused on building partnerships with my freelance clients.

A couple of pages taken out of lean UX book helped a lot.

263790__wallpaper-lines-creative-stripes-abstract-abstract-walls-lines-green-blue-backgrounds_p

While talking with potential clients, especially coming from Dribbble (I guess that’s due to visual nature of the site), I am sometimes having a hard time explaining how I work. I noticed a lot of people are still used to what I call “old agency model”, where designer puts a price tag on the work based on rough time estimate, then disappears with the project into oblivion and shows up a bit later with a finished project that might or might not fit the client’s vision. This is bad. For a while now I have been working with lessons taken out from Jeff Gothelf’s amazing book Lean UX and I have been really happy about it for several reasons:

You have to get over your ego

As a designer, you might be forced to show things that are not perfect. This is good for you. It’s a lot easier getting feedback from your client — or potential users — early than spending a lot of hours trying to pixel-perfect a solution that wouldn’t work in the first place. Remember that design is all about solving problems and if you’re solving the wrong problems, your pixel-perfect buttons don’t matter.

It breeds trust

If you’re working with people in your team — product owners, project managers, developers and so on — side by side, people start to understand that only last couple of percent of the design process is about the pixels. Majority of design happens in the designer’s head or sketches and a lot of things are not deliverables that you can show off to your client or colleagues. Working in the open is useful to you and the team or the client, because everyone knows what’s going on and understands the process.

It’s more focused

There’s an important saying in the lean startup community — shipped is better than perfect. If you can get your design out to potential users even with its flaws and problems, there’s higher chance that you will get useful feedback and act on it without going down the wrong route. There’s also usually less deliverables and a whole lot more of tweaking and fixing things. One major upside is also the fact that usually you don’t spend a lot of time building the wrong thing.

There are obviously downsides to this approach and you as a designer have to make sure you overcome this. The major obstacles I found so far are:

It gets micromanage-y

When working in the open you have to be prepared that a lot of people who are not designers will step in and try to get a say. This is good, but can be destructive to the project if you simply cave in and do whatever people tell you. Micromanagement never helped anyone and certainly won’t help your project if you allow it to happen. If you have to “fight” for your design, do it. Make sure you have data, examples and anything that can help you stand your ground but make sure to stay open for useful feedback. This is hard, so brace yourself and do your research.

It gets messy

A lot of people are not used to this process so when you show them somewhat imperfect mockup or prototype, they will go straight into criticising things that don’t look right. Stop them right there and make sure you’re talking about the same thing — if you were just trying to get one interaction right, make sure you’re on the same page with your team or your client. Make sure that you’re talking about what matters instead of dwelling on the details — there will be time for that.

It’s hard to estimate

While staying true to the iterative nature of design process, lean UX is incredibly hard to estimate, which can be tricky. The lean approach works incredibly well with product teams but the client needs to be updated with ongoing costs and time. The process is all about being open and trusting each other so make sure you communicate clearly how much things are taking and signal potential problems as soon as they appear — this helps avoiding going way over budget or spending lots of time working around some particular problem when there’s lots more other things to do.

I found it best to work with the lean startup “Minimum Viable Product” (or “Minimum Viable Experience”) and then take it from there if you’re working on a constrained budget.

All in all, I love working lean and I found it very liberating. I strongly recommend you to try it as well — while it’s hard at the beginning, it’s really worth it.


原创文章,作者:Smiler李想,如若转载,请注明出处:https://www.iamue.com/5942/

(0)
Smiler李想Smiler李想
上一篇 2015-06-01
下一篇 2015-06-02

相关推荐

  • 五一福利大放送,再不收藏就没有了哦

    老板阿西太抠,说了好久才同意五一送福利,今天小编就放血,给大家送点福利,机会不是天天有该出手时就出手。 图标和字体想怎么用就怎么就,让设计不再孤单,要的就是这个范儿。 字体下载地址:http://pan.baidu.co…

    2015-05-01
  • 交互设计师如何进行风险预判?

    在公司工作,任何职业都不可能单兵作战,协作是永恒的主题,而每一个需求和任务的实现,都是各方通力合作的成果。作为交互设计师,除了做好自己的设计工作之外,还需要花费大量的时间与产品、运营、客户端开发、前端开发、后端开发一起协作和沟通。

    2017-06-04
  • 经典必备知识!什么是交互设计的三大法则?

    @十萬個為什麽 :本文提到的三大铁律在交互设计中的地位接近圣经。细细品读,你会发现现代最流行的用户界面,都采用了这本里程碑式的著作中的概念与技巧,其中也包括微软和苹果的设备 >>>科幻作家艾萨克·…

    2017-08-01
  • 从“注意力”的角度,谈交互设计如何避免入坑

    前段时间UIMAX团队在做“新浪新闻客户端用户画像项目”时,用研人员访谈用户的过程中,发现一个这样的问题:多数用户完全没注意到过页面上的“长按可排序或删除”这段文字,反馈“不知道可以对新闻频道进行排序” 设计师…

    2017-06-05
  • 【UE&用户体验面试题】阿里巴巴 2015 用户体验专员实习生笔试题

    阿里巴巴 2015 用户体验专员实习生笔试题 1.某购物网站是大陆市场的领导者,为了扩展台湾市场,专门推出了该网站的台湾版并已上线。为了在台湾竞争激烈的电商 环境中脱引而出,吸引更多从未使用过该网站的台湾用户…

    2015-07-30
  • 别逗了,真正的“用户体验”并不如你们所说!

    User Experience is “a person’s perceptions and responses that result from the use or anticipated use of a product, system or service”.— ISO 9241-210The extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use.— ISO 9241-11— Baekdal, T., 2006. The Battle Between Usability and User-Experience [Online] Available at: The Battle Between Usability and User-Experience–Nielsen Norman Group, 2007. User Experience – Our Definition [Online] Available at: http://www.nngroup.com/about/userexperience.htmlBy Alan Penn, director of the Virtual Reality Centre for the Built Environment at University College LondonReference:Why User Experience Cannot Be DesignediA | Can Experience be Designed?文章一:Eric Baczuk, Design and the (Ir)Rational Mind: The Rise of Affective Sensing
    https://designmind.frogdesign.com/2014/05/design-irrational-mind-rise-affective-sensing-2;
    文章二:Daniel H. Pink, A Whole New Mind Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age
    http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/99315.A_Whole_New_Mind“做项目久了,难免就会职业病发,没成想现在最大的爱好就是拆字玩儿,总想着能从字本身的意思去弄点洞察出来。现在哪哪儿都在说用户体验,说实话,这个概念本人听的是真有点腻了,凡是个东西都要扯上“体验”二字。顺手在网上搜了下在线词典,这下面倒是有对于体验的几种原生态解释:1.亲自处于某种环境而产生认识2.指通过亲身实践所获得的经验3.所谓亲身经历与实地领会4.也含有查核,考察的意思
    从这些个解释里不难看出,从1,2,3的解释中,体验是包含有时间概念的:体验当下的那一刻,体验后的回想总结,以及建立下一次体验的心理预期和评判标准,其中反复强调的是“亲身”一词,这个时候,人的概念就被带出来了,不难看出所谓“体验”又包含了多少亲历者的主观意识;从4的解释中,个人觉得特有嚼头,这似乎是来了个总结:大多数的人都是带着“挑刺儿”的情怀去走完整个时间线的。
    最后,简单的总结下我想说的1.体验设计的who 是别人,体验包含太多主观因素,设计师要懂得如何充分提炼每个人情怀背后的深层共性。2.体验设计是围绕过去,现在和将来这条完整时间线的设计,绝对不是一锤子买卖。3.只要是人,就会对你为他们所架构的体验进行“审核”,所以作为设计师,千万要宽容要大度,那个被“骂”的点或许就是支撑前行的机会。文章中揭示的“互联网产业中对于User Experience和Interaction Design的混淆”可谓是一针见血。作为一名有着一点用户体验sense的互联网从业者,我往往会花费很多时间去说服决策者将投入更多地精力去研究用户,用更加宏观的角度去看待用户体验,但由于自己对于用户体验理解和阐述的局限性,这样的尝试往往无疾而终。我觉得这篇文章提供了很好的逻辑结构和对比佐证,让设计师能够更好地理解用户体验的同时也可以更好地把这个概念传输给别人。
    对于文章中提到的两个工具,Customer Journey Map和User Experience Questionnaire,在我看来虽然被证明在设计咨询和设计用户研究领域非常有效。但是在产品迭代迅速的互联网行业,决策者往往会更倾向于快速地推出产品、快速地试错、快速地更新迭代这样的“野蛮”方式来获取更加直接与准确的用户反馈。在这样的一种大环境下,相对传统的用户研究工具似乎因为周期长与结论的不确定性显得有些“笨重”,这也间接导致了部门互联网公司的决策者对于类似调研方式的抵触。如何做出改变,让这些有效地工具和理论在这样相对“野蛮”的环境中显得“接地气”,我觉得是作为一名设计师需要思考的问题。这篇文章很是解答了大家对于“用户体验”,“易用性”,包括“体验设计”的差别。非常赞同对于未来设计世界和人类世界对于情感化消费需求的方向,很多时候人们看似理性的消费实际上也是出于背后难以明状的亦或是潜意识亦或是外界的多重的信息刺激。神经科学(neuro science) 主张的决策下达从来都不是由内而外的,而是由外而内的。从这一点看,似乎“体验“还是可以被”设计“的,这种预设,结果当然越接近最终的现实越好。在《Thinking fast and slow》这本书中提到了诸多人们下决定的包括背后存在的偏见,所谓主观的意见实际也掺杂了背后潜意识的,本能的,直觉的迅速的判断,在这样的情况下,消费者的“体验”可以”被操控”的因素也大大增加了。说到底,人都是很有同理心(empathy)的动物,再正经地挣扎表现出理性的样子,也不过是那层薄如蝉翼的外壳罢了。“用户体验”就是在不停地触碰这层外壳,让“体验”直入你心。作为一个Service Design背景的设计策略师,用户体验之与我并不是虚拟产品中的手势,按钮,和A/B测试。用户体验融合在一整套服务系统里无形或有型的用户触点中。正如文章所提到的,实体体验的内容层级要远远超越互联网产品的易用性,它是一个更加复杂而庞大的系统,它需要深入挖掘人类需求的本源与动机,而并非只是依照某种需求本身位用户提供某类的便捷工具。
    正如Pine II和Gilmore在The Experience Economy一书中所述,任何企业在喝消费者互动时都是在导演体验,以一种个性化,令人难忘的方式与消费者建立联系,以服务为舞台,产品为道具,以品牌故事为剧本,当我们购买的是体验时,我们花钱享受的事商家为我们提供的一场难忘的回忆,就如同参与一场戏剧演出,其价值将长久地存在于我们的心里。
    试想一下MM巧克力世界,乐高积木世界,苹果体验中心,以及把体验做到极致的迪斯尼。他们永远不可能收到互联网产品的冲击。许多人说随着互联网服务的发展,电影院,商场,美容院,餐厅,所有的产业都将受到影响。然而,良好的体验是在一个人心理,生理,智力和精神水平处于高度刺激状态下形成的,这并非是互联网产品的良好易用性就可以轻易满足的需求。
    对于“用户体验”而言,“易用性”是衡量整个体验过程中所需要的某一工具的标准之一,而体验则应该思考如何通过全方位的营造让服务变乃至于整个生活状态变的更加丰满和人性。“用户体验”被广泛的使用和探讨,说明随着经济发展,消费者的需求已不再单薄。以设计为主导商业创新挑战才刚刚开始,作为这个时代的设计师,我们更应该以开放和学习的心态来迎接新的挑战!关于用户体验的未来的展望非常有趣。说到底是对人的更深入的了解是用户体验的根本。传统上来说,用户体验是基于对于用户更深切的研究,是以用户研究为基础的。也就是根据用户的所说,所做,所想,甚至所感挖掘出真实的用户的能力,需求和期待。而从上文用户体验不能被设计上来说,Context of use和User两个都是影响的因素。也就是说,未来对于User本身的了解的加深, 以及Context of use的改变也会对用户体验本身有着极大的影响。

    2017-06-03
  • 美国交互设计综合类&艺术类院校申请侧重点有哪些?

    回复【交互】,获得专业老师一对一专业指导随着现今数字智能等高科技的发展,交互设计成为近些年众多艺术留学生的热门首选专业。但热门并不代表很多同学都对交互设计有所了解,比如,根据向汉艺咨询的学生情况分析,90% 的同学都分不清什么是到底什么是交互,只是很表面的认为交互就是各种“APP”、“UI设计”或者VR/AR。实际上,即使国外最顶级的院校,你也找不到一所专门设立“APP”的专业,“UI设计”严格上来说只能算是“平面设计”,而设立VR/A...

    2018-04-18
  • 浅谈iOS与Android设计规范:6类交互设计规范对比

    iOS和Android两个不同的平台,肯定是有很多区别的,下面就从交互的角度,谈谈区别。

    2017-05-03
  • 良好的用户体验不一定是品牌成功的关键

    一项针对品牌魅力的新研究表明,良好的用户体验不一定是成功的关键,因为品牌完整性受损可能会超越公众的看法。 这是对四个市场10,000名消费者的在线调查的结果。这项研究从认知、目的、诚信、慷慨,勇气和交付的六个维度检查了知名品牌。分析表明,与消费者的动态关系是短暂的受欢迎,还是长期的忠诚之间存在的真正区别。乐高式最具实力的品牌,一直让顾客感到满意。相反,FIFA被评为得分最低的品牌。另外,苹果在美国排在前十位,在英国排在第十六位。尽管其创...

    2018-02-26
  • 在网页设计中,如何运用方框/方形元素?

    如何让方正方框/方形元素不死板有创意?今天这篇好文总结了超多的设计方法和实战案例,建议阅读。

    2017-05-07